Private Credit: Understanding the Capital Structure

By: Gridline Team | Published: 01/05/2023
Est. Reading Time:
5 minutes

Private credit, or direct lending, is a rapidly growing asset class that offers investors attractive yields and downside protection. As banks pull back from traditional lending, there’s a growing demand for a wide variety of private credit strategies, from middle-market lending to specialty finance and asset-backed lending.

Analysts forecast turbulent market conditions, with higher inflation and lower returns for traditional fixed-income assets. As such, most investors seek to increase their allocation to private credit. This asset class can help investors better manage risk and enhance returns over the long run. 

To better assess the potential opportunities, it is vital to understand how the capital structure works and how investments in private credit are positioned in the event of a downturn. The capital structure, also known as the capital stack, is the hierarchy of debts and equities in a company’s balance sheet and determines the order of payments in the event of bankruptcy.

The order of the capital stack

The capital stack, oriented from top to bottom, comprises senior debt, unitranche debt, subordinated debt, mezzanine debt, and equity. The top of the stack is the least risky, being repaid first in the event of bankruptcy. Equity is the riskiest at the bottom of the stack since it is repaid last.

Senior debt

In 2021, almost half of all capital raised by private debt funds went to senior debt. In an uncertain macroeconomic environment, investors want to access the attractive diversification and return potential offered by private credit but with low risk. Senior debt is the lowest-risk form of debt capital, so it has become the most sought-after.

This is because senior debt is typically secured by collateral or assets over which the lender has a ‘first lien’ (first claim). It has priority over more junior debt within the capital structure and typically carries a lower interest rate than more junior or subordinated debt.

Before the 2008 financial crisis, the private debt industry focused on subordinated and distressed debt. However, a mountain of new regulations imposed on banks, such as Basel III, have caused banks to become more conservative and less willing to provide senior debt. This has opened up opportunities for private debt investors to provide senior debt capital to companies, providing both security and returns.

Private debt investors are now companies’ primary source of senior debt capital. This has particularly benefited small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that may not have easy access to bank financing. Private debt funds can offer senior debt capital to SMEs and other companies at competitive rates and with flexible terms.

The senior debt market is expected to grow in 2023 and beyond as investors look for attractive returns without taking on too much risk. As private debt investors become increasingly confident in their ability to assess creditworthiness and structure debt deals, more senior debt capital will be available and more companies will be able to access the capital they need to grow and develop.

Unitranche debt

However, the demand for private debt goes beyond senior debt, and debt investors are increasingly diversifying across strategies. Unitranche debt, for instance, is a combination of senior and subordinated debt issued by one debt provider, usually used to facilitate a leveraged buyout.

It can help buyers simplify the debt structure, as one lender can satisfy the whole debt requirement. Since it contains senior and subordinated debt elements, the interest rate charged is often somewhere between the two.

Unitranche debt is becoming increasingly popular with buyers and lenders, allowing borrowers to access capital with a more simplified and efficient structure.

For lenders, unitranche debt provides an opportunity to increase their exposure to a transaction by taking on more risk than they would typically accept via a senior debt facility. Lenders also benefit from the fact that they can negotiate terms closer to those of a subordinated loan while still having the more senior debt element in the structure.

For investors, unitranche debt has its advantages. Since it combines senior and subordinated debt, the risk is balanced, protecting investors against default. Returns are also moderately attractive, as the interest rate is higher than that of senior debt but lower than that of subordinated debt.

Subordinated debt

Subordinated debt, also known as “junior debt,” is a loan further down the capital stack. This more risky debt typically attracts a higher interest rate than senior debt. It is often used when the borrower cannot access sufficient senior debt.

Subordinated debt is prevalent among smaller, more entrepreneurial companies that require additional capital to fund growth or acquisitions. Because of the higher risk associated with subordinated debt, lenders may require that the borrower have a track record of profitability and stability and a well-established business plan.

The primary benefit of subordinated debt is that it carries a lower cost of capital than equity, making it an attractive source of financing for growth-oriented companies. Moreover, it is typically less expensive than senior debt and can provide additional liquidity for a business.

The most significant risk is that the subordinated debt will be wiped out in the event of bankruptcy, meaning that the lender will not receive any return on their investment. Additionally, subordinated debt is typically unsecured, meaning that lenders do not have a claim on any of the borrower’s assets in the event of bankruptcy.

Mezzanine debt

Mezzanine, which means “in the middle,” is another form of capital that sits between senior debt and equity. It is typically used as a solution-oriented capital, meaning that the business owner is looking for an infusion of cash to solve a specific problem. 

It is attractive to businesses and lenders because it carries a higher interest rate than senior debt, typically 20% to 30%, and is often structured with warrants, giving the lender the option to convert the debt to equity if the company defaults.

Mezzanine lenders tend to be more flexible than banks and other senior lenders and often offer more attractive terms. Limited Partners (LPs) considering an investment in a mezzanine fund should be aware that private debt sits higher in the capital structure than equity, meaning that it will have priority in distributions and liquidation.

Despite the economic uncertainty, the outlook for mezzanine financing is vital. Indeed, this market volatility is causing some senior lenders to withdraw from the market, making mezzanine financing an attractive option for companies needing capital.


At the bottom of the capital structure is equity, the residual interest in a company’s assets after all debts have been paid. This is the riskiest form of capital since it is repaid last in the event of bankruptcy.

The appeal of equity capital is that, unlike debt, it does not require repayment and provides a stake to the investor in the company. Equity investors typically look to the long term and seek a return based on the potential appreciation of the company’s stock.

A thorough understanding of the capital structure is essential for anyone looking to access private credit market opportunities. Not only does it provide added insight into the risks and rewards associated with private debt investments, but it can also be used as a way to manage risk better and enhance returns.

Download this article for later.
Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque.
Share this Article
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | GLBA Notice

This site is operated by Gridline Holdings, LLC ("Gridline"). Gridline does not give investment advice, endorsement, analysis or recommendations with respect to any securities. All securities listed here are being offered by, and all information included on this site is the responsibility of, the applicable issuer of such securities. Gridline has not taken any steps to verify the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information. Neither Gridline nor any of its officers, directors, agents and employees makes any warranty, express or implied, of any kind whatsoever related to the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or the use of information on this site. By accessing this site and any pages thereof, you agree to be bound by the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Past performance is not indicative of future results. All securities involve risk and may result in significant losses. Investing in alternative investment funds is inherently risky and illiquid, involves a high degree of risk, and is suitable only for sophisticated and qualified investors. Investors must be able to afford the loss of their entire investment. Alternative investment funds should only be part of an investor’s overall investment portfolio. Further, the alternative investment fund portion of an investor’s portfolio should include a balanced portfolio of different alternative investments. Investments in alternative investment funds are speculative and involve a high degree of risk and those investors who cannot afford to lose their entire investment should not invest. Additionally, investors may receive illiquid and/or restricted securities that may be subject to holding period requirements and/or limited liquidity. Investments in Alternative investment funds are generally highly illiquid and those investors who cannot hold an investment for the long term should not invest.

Any specific alternative investments funds referenced on this site are included purely for illustrative purposes and selected based on name recognition. Such examples are only partial, and readers should not assume that the investments identified were or will be profitable or are representative of investments by the alternative investment funds identified on this site. There is no guarantee that any alternative investment fund will achieve the same exposure to, or quality of, investments held by any existing fund referenced on this site.

Nothing on this page shall constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy an interest in any investment partnership or other security. Any offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy an interest in an investment partnership may be made only by way of the partnership's final definitive confidential disclosure document and other offering and governance documents of any given fund (collectively, “Offering Documents”). The information on this site is qualified in its entirety and limited by reference to such Offering Documents, and in the event of any inconsistency between this site and such Offering Documents, the Offering Documents shall control. In making an investment decision, investors must rely on their own examination of the offering and the terms of any offering. Investors should not construe the contents of this site as legal, tax, investment or other advice, or a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security.

The information included in this site is based upon information reasonably available to Gridline. Furthermore, the information included in this site has been obtained from sources Gridline believes to be reliable; however, these sources cannot be guaranteed as to their accuracy or completeness. No representation, warranty or undertaking, express or implied, is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and no liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of any such information. This site may contain certain “forward-looking statements,” which may be identified by the use of such words as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential,” “outlook,” “forecast,” “plan” and other similar terms. All such forward-looking statements are conditional and are subject to various factors, including, without limitation, general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors, any or all of which could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results.

© 2023 Gridline Holdings, LLC