The Costs of Missing Out on Private Markets

By: Gridline Team | Published: 11/08/2022
Est. Reading Time:
2 minutes

In a downturn, many investors look for the perfect moment to enter the markets. Even worse, around 42% of Americans don't invest in the stock market, and even fewer have any experience with private markets.

With significant crashes on the mind of many investors, it's understandable why some individuals are skittish about stocks. Since 1974, there have been 24 separate market corrections, so even barring a recession, stocks regularly lose 10% or more of their value.

Private markets, too, experience regular volatility. However, choosing to sit out the markets would be a dire mistake. Calpers, the largest pension fund in the United States, recently admitted that avoiding private equity during the financial crisis cost them up to $18 billion. Around 2 million members rely on Calpers for their retirement, so the implications of this missed opportunity are vast.

Losing returns and diversification

Moreover, sitting out of private markets means foregoing one of the essential tools for diversification. Historically, private markets have experienced less steep drawdowns, faster recoveries, and higher long-term returns than public markets.

The average private equity fund generates a 19% net IRR, more than triple the S&P 500’s projected annualized returns over the next decade. Venture funds aim to outperform broad-based market indices by 5-15 percentage points, and this outperformance continues in downturns.

In the decade following the dot-com crash, private equity returned a 7.5% average, while the PME index annual return dropped to 0.08%. Buyout funds, too, are considerably more resilient than public markets, as only 2.8% of buyout funds experienced catastrophic loss during recessions, compared to 40% of stocks.

This outperformance is particularly pronounced among first-time funds, nearly 18% of which nab an IRR of 25%, while later funds only exceed that number about 12% of the time.

The reasons for this outperformance are numerous, but one key reason is that private companies are less efficiently priced. Fewer analysts are following these companies and less public information is available, so there's more room for mispricing. The so-called "complexity premium" results in private companies being cheaper than public companies with similar characteristics.

In addition, private firms aren't subject to the short-termism rampant in public markets. Public companies are under constant pressure to meet quarterly earnings targets, which can lead to suboptimal decision-making. Private firms have a longer time horizon and can take a more patient approach to business.

Moreover, while downturns hit public companies hard, they present opportunities for private equity firms to "buy and build." Private equity firms can buy up companies at a discount and then invest in them for the long term, which leads to outsize returns.

Get in the game

Investors who've written off private markets are missing out on a crucial tool for diversification and long-term growth. By avoiding private equity, Calpers lost billions of dollars in potential gains. For the average investor, the cost is no less real. In fact, according to Fidelity Investments, investors who missed the ten best stock market days missed out on 55% gains.

It's time to get in the game. Investing in private markets can be lucrative with proper due diligence and a long-term time horizon. Gridline makes it easy to access top-quartile private market investments with low capital minimums and high liquidity. Get started today to secure your financial future.

Download this article for later.
Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque.
Share this Article
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | GLBA Notice

This site is operated by Gridline Holdings, LLC ("Gridline"). Gridline does not give investment advice, endorsement, analysis or recommendations with respect to any securities. All securities listed here are being offered by, and all information included on this site is the responsibility of, the applicable issuer of such securities. Gridline has not taken any steps to verify the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information. Neither Gridline nor any of its officers, directors, agents and employees makes any warranty, express or implied, of any kind whatsoever related to the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or the use of information on this site. By accessing this site and any pages thereof, you agree to be bound by the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Past performance is not indicative of future results. All securities involve risk and may result in significant losses. Investing in alternative investment funds is inherently risky and illiquid, involves a high degree of risk, and is suitable only for sophisticated and qualified investors. Investors must be able to afford the loss of their entire investment. Alternative investment funds should only be part of an investor’s overall investment portfolio. Further, the alternative investment fund portion of an investor’s portfolio should include a balanced portfolio of different alternative investments. Investments in alternative investment funds are speculative and involve a high degree of risk and those investors who cannot afford to lose their entire investment should not invest. Additionally, investors may receive illiquid and/or restricted securities that may be subject to holding period requirements and/or limited liquidity. Investments in Alternative investment funds are generally highly illiquid and those investors who cannot hold an investment for the long term should not invest.

Any specific alternative investments funds referenced on this site are included purely for illustrative purposes and selected based on name recognition. Such examples are only partial, and readers should not assume that the investments identified were or will be profitable or are representative of investments by the alternative investment funds identified on this site. There is no guarantee that any alternative investment fund will achieve the same exposure to, or quality of, investments held by any existing fund referenced on this site.

Nothing on this page shall constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy an interest in any investment partnership or other security. Any offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy an interest in an investment partnership may be made only by way of the partnership's final definitive confidential disclosure document and other offering and governance documents of any given fund (collectively, “Offering Documents”). The information on this site is qualified in its entirety and limited by reference to such Offering Documents, and in the event of any inconsistency between this site and such Offering Documents, the Offering Documents shall control. In making an investment decision, investors must rely on their own examination of the offering and the terms of any offering. Investors should not construe the contents of this site as legal, tax, investment or other advice, or a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security.

The information included in this site is based upon information reasonably available to Gridline. Furthermore, the information included in this site has been obtained from sources Gridline believes to be reliable; however, these sources cannot be guaranteed as to their accuracy or completeness. No representation, warranty or undertaking, express or implied, is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and no liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of any such information. This site may contain certain “forward-looking statements,” which may be identified by the use of such words as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential,” “outlook,” “forecast,” “plan” and other similar terms. All such forward-looking statements are conditional and are subject to various factors, including, without limitation, general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors, any or all of which could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results.

© 2023 Gridline Holdings, LLC